It’s been a long semester here in Hillcrest. To the point that some now refer to it as Hellcrest, and with plenty of good reasons. The problems from Fall 2006 impacted nearly every facet of college life, from academics to dating to politics to university administration. After two years of relative stability, this semester has brought on a sudden and apparently inexplicable dismantling of a community.
We already know that “for every action, there is an equal and opposite reaction.” The entire Hillcrest Community has seen the reaction; now it’s time analyze the original action—the cause. Oddly enough, the abbreviation “HC” is a fitting acronym for many of the problems that have arisen these past 4 months.
Hyper conservatism
Jump back to Fall 2004, an election year. Shortly after my arrival at college, my friends and I were quickly termed the “Hyper Conservative Posse,” or the HCP for short. It became a joke to us, and I was soon labeled the “token moderate.” At the time, it was rather humorous, but in a gratingly dark and sinister fashion—at least to me. Maybe I was the only one who saw it that way.
Fast forward to Fall 2006, the year of the national midterm elections. Lying dormant for two years, the time was once again ripe for hyper-conservatism to rear its ugly head. Recall the term “compassionate conservative” from the 2004 elections. I can assure you that any such label is the antithesis of every quality the HCP exhibited this time around. Perhaps the nature of the HCP had drifted right since the 2004 elections; maybe it was propelled right by the addition of two new “token liberals” since 2004; it’s even possible the HCP was drawn right by the addition of a heavy-hitting conservative in 2005. Regardless of the cause, there has definitely been a bit of rightward shift.
On the Republican agenda during this trip to the polls were several moral issues, including stem cell research and—more importantly—the issue of gay marriage (to purposefully abandon the use of politically correct terms). I can already hear the cynics in the crowd asking: “Why do you care? You’re straight.” While true, that factoid has no bearing on the other fact that I now know at least six people who range from “not entirely straight” to “entirely homosexual.” These people are all completely normal, functional human beings, and their life decisions are theirs to make. While you are welcome to disagree with those decisions personally, it is absolutely inexcusable to force your morality on them through law—particularly on completely innocent issues like this, which will present no impact to your private life whatsoever. To those who will say “well, murder is a moral issue,” I offer the fact that murder directly impacts the lives of other people, and not just the victim.
To nobody’s surprise, however, the overarching opinion was “gay marriage is bad.” Fine. I disagree, but you’re welcome to that opinion. And now a very brief lecture on how voting works: you go to the poll and fill out your ballot. You select candidates you support and voice your opinion on issues up as referenda. It’s really quite simple. The only cases in which you should abstain from voting are on those issues and offices for which you legitimately have no opinion, or cannot make an informed decision. You do not abstain from voting just to please your friends, because you “knew it would pass anyway.” If you have an opinion, vote it. You cannot have your cake and eat it too; people will find out.
The real opinions and values of certain sects of the HCP were made blindingly apparent this semester, and the backstabbing hyper-conservatism was a little much for me (and others) to stomach. Maybe some of the HCP set a bad example, but the rank smell of deceit remains around all its members. I found myself caught in the rift between the HCP and those they crossed, which quickly made this semester my most awkward, uncomfortable, and miserable one to date.
Intolerance is a serious problem; it plagues parts of the HCP, and is slowly affecting larger portions of Hillcrest.
Heartless commentary
There are many terms for the concept of “think before you speak,” such as the Hillcrest favorite, the “brain-to-mouth filter.” For some people, it’s obvious that either this filter is dysfunctional, or they really don’t care about the feelings of others. Usually, I wouldn’t count myself as one who really doesn’t care; after my charades last Friday, I’ve since joined the club. However, that fact bothers me, whereas it doesn’t bother some whom it ought.
Let’s digress to gay marriage for a short while. It was a very heated and oft-discussed issue within Hillcrest this semester, with so much riding on the outcome of the elections, particularly regarding Virginia’s gay marriage legislation. I know precisely one gay couple, so perhaps my sample size is a little low, but allow me to explain. They have been together for 20 years or more, without any of the legal benefits that accompany marriage, and definitely with the occasional scorn that must come from people intolerant of gays. Perhaps I’m talking out of my proverbial rear, but there are a lot of “normal” marriages that end in a matter of years, instead of going strong even after a matter of decades. So this is an example of a gay couple who have been together for considerably longer than most of today’s shorter-lived marriages.
Why is this relevant? I’ll tell you. The comment was made—by a member of the HCP—that “the love you feel isn’t the same kind of love I feel.” To add context, this was from a straight person to a gay person. How anyone on the planet that is not a member of both camps (so to speak) feels qualified to make that judgement call, I will never understand. And, as my story above would indicate, it seems that a gay couple may in fact feel a stronger bond than many straight couples. So making a broad, uninformed statement like this is a complete load of crap. This one comment was particularly ill-timed, and summarily insensitive. It should be no marvel that these individuals stopped talking, but said member of the HCP is so dense that he hasn’t a clue.
Don’t throw around such senseless and baseless comments; it’s dumb, and further crumbles a group already falling apart.
Hopeless crushes
And while we’re on the subject of marriage, it’s an appropriate follow-up to consider the dating antics that have plagued Hillcrest and the HCP this semester. As with any high school or college scene, rumor mongering is an extremely entertaining pass-time (apparently). Being fair, I’ll start with a known fact that began as a rumor, and from it stems a myriad of stress-inducing and foundation-shaking problems that have shown themselves this fall.
In the beginning, it was a new semester; we were all busy meeting new people and making new friends. If this sounds a too altruistic to be true, you’re entirely correct. This happy-go-lucky phase lasted about two weeks, tops. Except for a couple people… two, specifically. One of my friends seemed to be hanging out frequently with one of the girls new to the dorm this year; an RA. So, of course, the rest of the HCP started whispering quietly about what was afoot, almost a full month before either he or she was ready to disclose the truth. It turns out that the rumors were correct, but that’s not the point; as I soon found, being part of a rumor is infinitely less fun than discussing a rumor.
Returning to the first few weeks of school, there was another girl new to the dorm, who hung out in my room frequently. Allegedly this was because my roommate and I are just fun people to hang around. Being me, I took that tale at face value, seeing no reason to read any further into it—at least, not publicly. Needless to say, that’s not what the rest of the HCP saw. Judging by the quiet conversations, the cryptic comments, and playful jabs, the HCP believed for sure that she had developed an active interest in me. Why they subscribed to that notion, I don’t know, because—at the time—she very clearly and very publicly had a boyfriend. End of story, right?
Not quite. All was fine and dandy until one day I walked in on a conversation that I was not expected to hear. Allegedly, my softball playing improved one day when she showed up to watch us practice. I didn’t change anything, but I really did not appreciate being mocked when I wasn’t around, especially due to beliefs that were entirely inaccurate—at least, what they believed was wrong. It was pretty clear (to me, at least) that she had no interest in me, as they believed. However, I had developed an interest in her. I kept it private, because nobody needed to know. To make a long story short, the rumors got a little out of hand, and I explained the entire situation to her, including the rumors and my story. Seemed like the right thing to do, so I did.
Is there a moral here? Very much so. Once you’ve aired the truth, see what happens, and let it go. This really shouldn’t be a hard concept! But apparently it is…
So yet again, the same comment-maker from above very clearly developed a crush on the RA that was, at this point, already taken. That’s fine and dandy, because nobody would ever know—unless, of course, you pull stupid stunts that give it away. It should be common sense and common courtesy that you do not try to steal someone else’s girlfriend, and that you absolutely do not give them grief about being in a relationship. Some of the underhanded and out-of-line comments have been ridiculous. Crushes are fine, but when someone is taken or clearly uninterested, you have to just let it go. Anything else will simply make you more enemies than friends. I let it go, at least. But apparently it’s hard for other people not to be underhanded jerks.
Life sucks sometimes, so get used to it. If something doesn’t go your way, suck it up and move on; don’t make someone else’s life hell because of it. Why is this so hard to understand?
Hatred and cruelty
If there’s anything I know well, it’s stress. It’s a terrible affliction that is simply a side effect of being human. So we learn to deal with it; some people handle it well, and some people really don’t. For example, one great outlet for stress is sports—either playing or watching. However, an important factor in managing stress is mitigating its causes. There are a lot of life problems that justify stress, but there are a lot of petty issues that really don’t.
One of those issues is grades. I spent three years barely passing middle school, and one year doing the same in high school. I spent my last three years of high school cleaning up my act and recovering from my blunders. I pulled it out enough to barely get into the honors community here, but not enough to land the scholarship many say I deserve. I won’t disagree, but there’s nothing I can do about it; so I leave well enough alone. Despite attending hundreds of lectures during my first year of college, there was only one lesson I learned. It had absolutely nothing to do with school.
Unless you count the school of hard knocks. It sounds easy for me to say, but there are many things more important than grades. Staying in school is important to your future, but when the bottom really does fall out, good grades won’t save you. You’ll be desperately reaching for friends and family; ultimately, for love. Because when the world turns upside-down, that’s all you’ve got left. I should know, because I’ve been there before. The point is this: many of my friends have become disproportionately obsessed with grades, and they’ve become blind to other life matters.
Being concerned about grades is OK. I am, because I need to be. What’s unacceptable, however, is allowing grades affect your mood and personality for weeks prior to and following tests. Talking to friends about what I view as past missteps (skipping class) is absolutely not just cause to be hostile and violent toward me; pummeling me with remote controls is far beyond acceptable. I have every right to be worried about my exams, and do not deserve to be hounded about the fact that I usually do well. I’m fallible just like everyone else. To the guilty parties here—you know who you are—it should come as no surprise that the open hostility is rapidly eroding my interest in your company.
So there’s a lot more to life than school and grades. It’s not kosher to tote inferiority complexes, superiority complexes, and general hostility relating to school, grades, and majors. Nothing is worth letting your stress end friendships; always keep that in mind.
Harems and cliques
And now back to issues that pertain to the Hillcrest community more than the HCP. The HCP has it’s fair share of issues, but what’s happened to the community as a whole is altogether more disturbing. When I began as a freshman, the idea of Hillcrest was to form an intellectual community, wherein each person harbors his or her own opinions, and is willing to civilly share them with others. Perhaps an effect of election-year politics, the community has noticeably split itself into many sects, cliques, and harems.
The most obvious clique is the HCP and its close company. This group of friends came to be for two reasons, which are (1) we are all engineers, and thus benefit from keeping company, but more importantly (2) most everyone is comparatively conservative. It seems that Hillcrest, including the HCP, has fallen victim to one of the most dangerous fallacies that plagues us today—forming your communities based on those who agree with you. The goal of an honors community is to challenge and reevaluate ideas, but what has happened is coagulation and stagnation: like beliefs have clumped off into small little groups.
For example, all the RAs except for one have formed their own group, which now summarily dismisses any input members of the HCP might have, simply because we are the HCP. Whether our input is valid or well-founded is irrelevant; the source immediately discredits it. I dare say that “the management’s” such nonchalant dismissal of feedback is frightening. You’re supposed to run the building and the community based on everybody’s feedback; not just input from your close and carefully-selected friends. Playing favorites is a terrible habit, particularly when you’re in a position of authority.
A community is not supposed to be made of discrete groups; it’s supposed to be a fluid mass of cooperating and coexisting individuals. The growing tendency to discredit and ignore those who induce intellectual sores is bothersome. If you can’t back up your beliefs, maybe you should do some rethinking—don’t simply avoid those who shake your foundations.
A saving grace?
There’s no overarching point to this exorbitantly long rant. Each of the various flaws I’ve seen, I discussed. I’m neither innocent nor guilty on all counts. The hope here is that—perhaps—everyone will read this and see themselves in it. This semester has taught me a lot, but I feel like my friends and community have continued down the same path they’ve followed for two years now. We’ve all got to learn from our mistakes, but it’s impossible to learn if nobody highlights them as mistakes or transgressions.
I’m aware that this will offend a lot of people, but sometimes the truth just needs to be told. I’m equally at fault for falling into my own factions here in the community, and as a couple others and I have realized, it’s about time we stopped the drain. Unlike previous years, none of the blame lies on the freshmen, nor should it be unjustly placed on them; the blame lies squarely on us upperclassmen for subconsciously dividing the community into groups as we have. Maybe it will get better going forward, or maybe it’s beyond repair. Nothing’s set in stone, so we’ll see how it all turns out. I’ve seen the community get along before, so I know it’s possible.
Here’s to hoping it can once more.